Monday, 11 March 2013

Recording the moves

This is the first of an occasional series on the Rules of Chess.

FIDE Rule 8.1 states:

"In the course of play each player is required to record his own moves and those of his opponent in the correct manner, move after move, as clearly and legibily as possible, in the algebraic notation, on the scoresheet prescribed for the competition.

It is forbidden to write the moves in advance, unless the player is claiming a draw according to Article 9.2, or 9.3.

A player may reply to his opponent’s move before recording it, if he so wishes. He must record his previous move before making another.

Both players must record the offer of a draw on the scoresheet.

If a player is unable to keep score, an assistant, who must be acceptable to the arbiter, may be provided by the player to write the moves. His clock shall be adjusted by the arbiter in an equitable way."

Taking these one at a time...

1.   Legible moves.  You must record the moves legibly so that if necessary, the whole game can be reconstructed by reading your scoresheet.   For a number of years now, it is required that recording is made in algebraic (not descriptive) notation.  In a tournament, if scoresheets are provided (usually duplicate or triplicate ones), these must be used if so required by the tournament controller.   If you usually like to record moves in your own scorebook, you will have to transcribe the moves to your book after the game has finished.

2.  Not writing moves in advance.  This rule has been in effect since 2005.  This is an important change because some players had become accustomed, even encouraged, to write down their intended move, consider it, then make it on the board.   Many chess coaches, including Kevin O'Connell, insisted that juniors did it this way.   But note-taking during a game is forbidden, and writing moves in advance could in some circumstances be considered as 'note-taking'.   There were also a number of examples where players (usually juniors) would write down their intended move and get their coach or parent to stroll past and give a nod or a shake of the head!

The Rule also states that there are two exceptions.   If you want to claim a draw because a three times repetition is about to occur (Rule 9.2) or if 50 moves will have been played without any capture or pawn move (Rule 9.3), then you should write down your intended move that will create the three times repetition or 50 moves, then stop the clock and make the claim.   If you touch a piece before writing down the move, then you lose your right to claim on that move.   Effectively you would have to wait until a fourth repetition is about to occur, or 51 moves etc.

3.  Delaying recording.  You are not required to write down your move immediately after you have played it; you can wait until your opponent has replied, and then record both your move and the opponent's move.  (You must do this before you make your next move).   Several people adopt this method as a time-saving device and I would encourage people to record in this fashion.   You can lose several minutes across a whole game by recording your opponent's moves whilst your own clock is running.

4.  The draw offer.  If, during the game, you offer a draw, you must record that offer on your scoresheet by writing '=' after the move when you made the offer.  Similarly, you must record any offers made by your opponent.   This is important, because repeated draw offers could be considered as an attempt either to gain time, or to deliberately annoy the opponent.  If you feel that your opponent is guilty of this, you can draw the matter to the attention of the arbiter (in a tournament), who will want to inspect your scoresheet to ascertain how often draw claims have been made.

5.  Use of substitute recorder.  A player who is disabled in some way may be unable to write down the moves, in which case someone else can be appointed to maintain a record of the game.   It is common in a tournament for the arbiter to deduct a few minutes, say five, from the disabled player's time, as he will not have to spend any thinking time on recording the moves.

In addition to the above, FIDE Rule 8.4 states:

"If a player has less than five minutes left on his clock at some stage in a period and does not have additional time of 30 seconds or more added with each move, then for the remainder of the period he is not obliged to meet the requirements of Article 8.1.  Immediately after one flag has fallen the player must update his scoresheet completely before moving a piece on the chessboard."

In Suffolk League matches, there are two time periods, one ending at the 30-move control and the other at the end of the game.   Thus when you have less than five minutes remaining in either period, you can stop recording the moves.  However, if this happens in the first time control period, you must update your score after the time control has been reached by doing so in your own time.   You may borrow your opponent's scoresheet to do so.   If you stop recording in the final time period, then the scoresheet should still be updated when the game has been completed.   If both players have stopped recording because they are short of time, then it is acceptable, after the 30th move has been reached, to stop the clocks and reconstruct the game, if necessary by using another board.

Penalties.   In an arbiter-controlled tournament, a penalty may be incurred in any instance where these rules have been broken.   This can range from a warning, to the loss of the game (or even expulsion from the event!)   If your opponent stops recording prematurely, it is best simply to remind them that they should still be recording.   Similarly, if your opponent writes down their intended moves before making them, they should be gently reminded that this is not allowed.   If they continue to fail to record, or write down their moves before making them, then the clocks should be stopped and the arbiter summoned.   The arbiter will normally issue a warning, but can also add two or three minutes to your time if it is felt that you have been inconvenienced.

I've tried to make this as accurate as possible, but if you disagree with something I've written, or have any other thoughts on the above, please comment below.


Sunday, 10 March 2013

Anita prepares for Greece

Back in February I reported on 8-year old Anita Somton's call-up to the England team.   This is now confirmed, as can be seen on the ECF Juniors page (scroll down to near the bottom to see Anita's write-up).

Anita is now receiving intensive coaching from N. Jyothilal, from the Hamara Chess Academy in India.   He is currently living in London and played recently in the FIDE Open at the London Chess Classic.

The World Schools Chess Championships will be taking place in Halkidiki, Greece, between the 6 and 15 May.  Anita will be playing in the Under 9 tournament.   We all wish her the best of luck.


Friday, 8 March 2013

Under 11 team selected

The Suffolk Under 11 team will be competing against other counties in the EPSCA Eastern Zone Final next Saturday, 16 March, in Northampton.   Because Norfolk has not entered a team, we have been allowed to 'borrow' two of their top players; they have slotted straight in on boards 1 and 2.   The remainder of the team has been provided by either the Abbey Prep (Woodbridge School) or the Bury Knights Junior Chess Club.  Sadly, there are no other junior clubs in the county and not many schools are running chess clubs.   Only the top five boards have current ECF grades.

The 20-board team is:

1     Ryan Chan (Norfolk) - 108
2     Karthik Saravanan (Norfolk) - 116
3     Alex Sheerin (Bury Knights and Ipswich CC) - 105
4     Anita Somton (Bury Knights) - 59
5     Mario Saenz de Villaverde (Bury Knights) - 83
6     Daniel Garcia-Leon (Bury Knights)
7     Alan John (Bury Knights)
8     William Moody (Bury Knights)
9     Toby Cassy (Woodbridge)
10   Oliver Phelan (Woodbridge)
11   William Starling (Bury Knights)
12   Aaron Saenz de Villaverde (Bury Knights)
13   Giles Kelleway (Woodbridge)
14   Abel Vadakelan (Bury Knights)
15   Malik Bunton (Bury Knights)
16   Alex Hammond (Woodbridge)
17   George Wharam (Woodbridge)
18   Liya Baby (Bury Knights)
19   Bethany Young (Bury Knights and Stowmarket CC)
20   Zoe Newman (Woodbridge)

The other eight 'counties' are Barnet, Birmingham, Cambridgeshire, Essex, Hertfordshire, Kent, Northamptonshire and Richmond.   Each person plays three games, with 50 minutes each on the clock.   The six top scoring teams will progress to the National Finals, which take place in Nottingham on 11 May.



Thursday, 7 March 2013

The Rules of Chess

I am planning to discuss various FIDE rules in future posts on this website.   I know that some players are unaware or uncertain of some rules, so this will be an attempt to provide advice on those that are frequently misunderstood.

If anyone reading this would like to suggest a rule that you would like to see discussed, please let me know.   I am considering the following, but would be pleased to hear of any more about which you would appreciate clarification:

7.4  -  illegal moves
8.1  -  recording moves and draw offers
9.1  -  offering a draw
10.2  -  the 'two-minute' rule
13.4  -  possible penalties for rule infringements
13.7  -  conduct of spectators (and 12.5)

For a full list of FIDE rules, click here.


Wednesday, 6 March 2013

Ladies' latest

Three rounds of the Suffolk Ladies' Championship have now been completed.

The following table includes byes, as each entrant receives one bye during the tournament.   It also includes one match already played in Round 4:

Name Grade Won Drawn Lost Bye Points
Vicky Allen 112 3 1 0 0
Emilia Jewell 132 2 0 0 1 3
Adèle Lunn 105 2 1 0 0
Anita Somton 59 1 0 1 1 2
Alba Saenz de Villaverde 76 1 0 2 0 1
Bethany Young e25 0 0 3 1 1
Liya Baby e25 0 0 3 0 0

The pairings for Round 4 are:

Emilia v Adèle
Bethany v Vicky (already played   0 - 1)
Alba v Anita
Liya - (Bye)

The remaining matches are due to be played by 10 March.


Tuesday, 5 March 2013

Under 160s qualify for the National rounds

On Sunday, the Suffolk Under 160 team played Hertfordshire and Cambridgeshire, the two teams most likely to qualify for the National rounds.   Back in December, a strong Hertfordshire team beat Suffolk and another win for them would have meant almost certain qualification.   So the morning match against Herts was vitally important for Suffolk.   On grading alone, Suffolk appeared to be facing an uphill task, with Herts averaging three points per board advantage.

As the match proceeded, it became increasingly evident that Suffolk would win.   Some exceptional results, especially on the top boards, where Suffolk scored 3½ out of 4, helped towards a convincing win by 10½ points to 5½.

This win ensured that Suffolk would now qualify for the National quarter-final; the afternoon match against Cambridgeshire would only decide first and second places within the EACU.

Cambridgeshire fielded one of the strongest-ever teams seen in the Under 160s.   Their Board 16 was graded 143 and the team averaged over 152, eight points more than Suffolk.   The result, unsurprisingly, was a win for Cambridgeshire, by the same score as the morning match, 10½-5½.

The final league table is shown below.   Cambridgeshire now play the runners-up in the Midlands Zone, whilst Suffolk are away to the winners, Nottinghamshire.   The date and venue will be decided later.

Team Played Won Drawn Lost Match Points Game Points
Cambridgeshire 6 5 0 1 10 58½
Suffolk 6 4 0 2 8 51
Hertfordshire 6 3 0 3 6 53 *
Norfolk 6 0 0 6 0 29½ *

*   These totals are estimated, as the final score between Herts and Norfolk is not known (although Herts definitely won convincingly).

Norfolk again defaulted two boards, as they had done in December.   They clearly have commitment problems with their players.

Individual results from the matches played on Sunday were:

Board Name Grade Results
1 Leon Burnett e155 ½ . ½
2 Sam Brennan 152 1 . 0
3 Silas Peck 154 1 . ½
4 Stephen Lewis 152 1 . ½
5 Rob Harden e150 0 . 0
6 Bob Jones 153 ½ . ½
7 Les Jones 148 ½ . ½
8 Vivian Woodward 147 ½ . 0
9 Scott Taylor 144 1 . 0
10 Colin Roberts 140 0 . 0
11 Andrew Shephard 136 1 . 0
12 John McAllister 136 ½ . 1
13 Ed Kirkham 133 1 . ½
14 Jakob Tulic 133 1 . 0
15 John Lambert 137 ½ . 1
16 Carl Phillips 134 ½ . ½

Excellent performances from the 'new boys' - Leon Burnett, Stephen Lewis, John McAllister, John Lambert and Carl Phillips - unbeaten over their ten games!

Over the season, 26 people have played in the Under 160s.   Of these, six (Rob Harden, Bob Jones, Scott Taylor, Andrew Shephard, Ed Kirkham and Colin Roberts) have played in all the matches.   The leading player has been Ed Kirkham, with four wins (including one default win) and two draws.


Monday, 4 March 2013

First team lead the EACU

Following yesterday's matches against Bedfordshire, Suffolk's First team, captained by Ian Wallis lead the EACU First Team League:

Team Played Won Drawn Lost Match Points Game Points
Suffolk 4 3 0 1 6 36½
Norfolk 4 2 1 1 5 34½
Bedfordshire 4 2 0 2 4 32½
Cambridgeshire 4 0 1 3 1 24½

The final two matches, against Norfolk and Cambridgeshre, will be played on Sunday 17 March.

Indivdidual results from the matches played yesterday were:

Board Name Grade Results
1 Ed Player 214 ½ . ½
2 Alan Merry 214 1 . 1
3 Shaun Munson 206 ½ . 1
4 David Spence 206 ½ . 1
5 Graham Moore 186 1 . 0
6 Ted Matthewson 182 ½ . ½
7 Mike Cook 190 ½ . ½
8 Rob Sanders 177 ½ . ½
9 Phil Hopkins 177 0 . ½
10 Steve Gregory 174 ½ . ½
11 Ian Wallis 174 0 . 1
12 Richard Lamont 171 ½ . 0
13 Steve Ruthen 169 ½ . ½
14 John Feavyour 168 0 . 0
15 Phil Hutchings 160 ½ . 1
16 Michael Clapham 158 ½ . 1

Alan Merry's first game, as Black, against Steve Ledger, had a nice finish.   This was the position after Black's 41st move (Re8).   White is a pawn ahead, but Black's pair of bishops, especially the raking dark-squared bishop, more than compensate:


In fact, White is unable to hold on to his e-pawn, and his position soon collapses:

42.  Re1   Bc3
43.  Rh1   Rxe4
44.  Rxh6+   Kg7
45.  Rxd6   Bxf5
46.  Nh5+   Kf8 (the only move)
47.  Ng3   Re1#

There will be a full report on the Under 160s tomorrow.


Sunday, 3 March 2013

Results of County matches

Here's a brief report on today's County matches, at the Turner Hall in Newmarket.   Suffolk teams had a mixed day.

The First Team lost 7½-8½ to Bedfordshire in the morning, but playing the same opponents with the opposite colour, managed to win 9½-6½ in the afternoon.

The Under 160s beat Hertfordshire 10½-5½ in the morning, but lost by the same score to Cambridgeshire in the afternoon.   Both Cambridgeshire and Suffolk have qualified for the national rounds.

Of the 32 Suffolk players, the only one to win both games was Alan Merry, who beat Steve Ledger twice.   The first of these games included a nice finish, which will feature in tomorrow's posting, along with league tables and individual scores.


Saturday, 2 March 2013

A busy day tomorrow for the County teams

Both the Suffolk First Team and the Under 160s are playing tomorrow, at the Turner Hall in Newmarket.   The First Team (capt. Ian Wallis) takes on Bedfordshire, playing them twice during the day.   Meanwhile, the Under 160s (capt. Bob Jones) play Hertfordshire in the morning and Cambridgeshire in the afternoon.

The First Team is well-placed to take over at the head of the division.   So far this season they have beaten both Norfolk (9-7) and Cambridgeshire (10½-5½).   The matches against Bedfordshire will provide a clearer picture, with all four counties then having played four matches.

The Under 160s is very close, with three teams, Suffolk, Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire, all vying for the main qualifying place.   Although there are two qualifying places, the runner-up county is required to play an extra match in a preliminary round, before entering the national rounds proper.   So two wins tomorrow for Suffolk would be excellent!   On grades alone our team is not quite as strong as it was in the last matches in January, but grades can be misleading.   For example how can Andrew Shephard be a 136?   In his last nine games since the start of 2013 he is unbeaten and is averaging 181.  A useful Board 11, methinks.

The results of both the First Team and the Under 160s will be posted here late Sunday evening.

Friday, 1 March 2013

Division 3 update

Division 3 hasn't had a mention since mid-December - see here - so it's high time we had an update.

Ipswich D still retain the lead, but Woodbridge School, who have scored 8 points from their last three matches (including a 3½-½ win over Ipswich D), are snapping at their heels.

DIVISION 3


Team Played Won Drawn Lost Points
Ipswich D 10 7 0 3 26
Woodbridge School 9 4 3 2 21½
Ipswich E 9 5 2 2 20½
Saxmundham B 9 3 2 4 16
Felixstowe 8 3 2 3 15
Clacton B 9 2 2 5 14
Stowmarket Rooks 8 1 1 6 10½

In the Player of the Season competition, Phil Mortonson is in the lead with 6½/8 (75%), whilst Keith Woodcock (70%) and Nikolay Lastochkin (67½%) are close behind.  The early leaders, Daniel Such and Silas Peck, have played an insufficient number of games to qualify.


Newer Posts Older Posts Home